E-navigation as an infrastructure basis for the development of autonomous and unmanned shipping
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of international experience in developing and implementing the concept of e-Navigation as a key area of digital transformation in maritime shipping. It examines the evolution of the International Maritime Organization’s strategic approaches to creating an integrated “ship–shore–ship” information environment based on the standardized collection, exchange, presentation, and analysis of maritime data. Particular attention is paid to the updated Implementation Plan for the e-Navigation Strategy (MSC.1/Circ.1595), the further development of maritime service descriptions (MSC.1/Circ.1610, MSC.1/Circ.1610/ Rev.1), and the development of the architecture for digital maritime services. The three-component structure of e-Navigation (on-board, shore-based, and communication components) is analyzed as the basis for creating a unified situational picture of the maritime domain. It is demonstrated that the integration of shipboard navigation systems, vessel traffic services (VTS), and modern telecommunications technologies enhances maritime safety, optimizes routes, and reduces operational costs. The role of the IHO S-100 standard as a universal geospatial data model for next-generation electronic navigation products (S-101, S-102, S-104, S-111, S-124), which form the technological basis of S-100 ECDIS and ensure system interoperability, is examined separately. Significant attention is paid to the relationship between e-Navigation and the development of unmanned navigation. It has been established that the effective operation of autonomous and remotely controlled vessels is possible only if there is a well-developed digital infrastructure, standardized route exchange (STM), the Maritime Connectivity Platform, and integrated risk management services. The significance of the human element in the context of digitalization is revealed: it is demonstrated that automation does not completely eliminate risks but transforms their nature, requiring new approaches to decision support, interface ergonomics, and adaptive systems for monitoring operators’ cognitive load. The paper summarizes the results of international test areas and pilot projects (MONALISA 2.0, EfficienSea2, Yangshan Port e-NAV, ESESAME Straits, TICON), which confirmed the potential to reduce navigational risks, lower fuel consumption, and decrease CO₂ emissions through harmonized data exchange and the integration of maritime services. It has been shown that the current stage of e-Navigation’s development is characterized by a transition to an intelligent, human-centered digital ecosystem that integrates S-100 standards, the concept of a digital twin of navigable waters, STM systems, and secure communication platforms. It is argued that the further implementation of e-Navigation is iterative in nature and requires coordinated interaction among international organizations, national administrations, scientific institutions, and the private sector. Development prospects are linked to the integration of multi-layer geospatial data in real time, the improvement of decision support systems, and the creation of a fully digital maritime traffic management environment. The results obtained can be used to develop regulatory and methodological frameworks for the implementation of e-Navigation and to formulate a strategy for the development of autonomous shipping.
Article Details
References
2. Pietrzykowski, Z., Magaj, J., & Wołejsza, P. (2022). The autonomous navigation system of a sea-going vessel. Ocean Engineering, 261, 112104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112104 [in English]
3. Burmeister, H.C., Bruhn, W., Rødseth, Ø.J., & Porathe, T. (2014). Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-Navigation implementation: The MUNIN perspective. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 1, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2014.12.002 [in English]
4. Porathe, T., Burmeister, H.-C., & Rødseth, Ø. J. (2013). Autonomous shipping in the context of the 12th COMPIT Conference. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT’13) (pp. 177-183). Cortona. [in English]
5. Rødseth, Ø.J., & Tjora, Å. (2014). A system architecture for an unmanned ship. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT) (pp. 291-302). [in English]
6. Vahushchenko, L.L. (2013). Suchasni informatsiini tekhnolohii v sudnovo-dinny [Modern information technologies in navigation]. Odesa: ONMA. [in Ukrainian]
7. Ringbom, H. (2019). Regulating Autonomous Ships – Concepts, Challenges and Precedents. Ocean Development & International Law, 50(2–3), 141-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2019.1582593 [in English]
8. Tomchakovskyi, H., Rossomakha, O., Oberto Santana, L., Safian, O., & Koliesnik, O. (2025). Analiz liudskoho elementu v konteksti rozvytku morskykh avtonomnykh nadvodnykh suden [Analysis of the human element in the context of maritime autonomous surface ships development]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho morskoho universytetu, 75, 108-121. https://doi.org/10.47049/2226-1893-2025-1-108-121 [in Ukrainian]
9. International Maritime Organization. (2018). MSC 100/20/Add.1 Annex 28: Framework for the regulatory scoping exercise. Retrieved January 15, 2026, from https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Pages/MSC-100th-session.aspx [in English]
10. Kystverket. (n.d.). Core objectives. Retrieved January 16, 2026, from https://kystverket.no/en/About-Kystverket/International-work/enavigation/ [in English]
11. International Maritime Organization. (2014). Strategy for the development and implementation of e-navigation (MSC 85/26/Add.1, Annex 20). London: IMO. [in English]
12. International Maritime Organization. (2018). MSC.1/Circ.1595 – E-Navigation Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP), Update 1. Retrieved January 17, 2026, from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Safety/Documents/enavigation/MSC.1-Circ.1595-E-Navigation-Strategy-Implementation-Plan-Update-1.pdf [in English]
13. International Maritime Organization. (2019). MSC.1/Circ.1610 – Initial descriptions of maritime services in the context of e-navigation. London: IMO. Retrieved February 20, 2026, from https://www.imo.org/ [in English]
14. International Maritime Organization. (2024). MSC.1/Circ.1610/Rev.1 – Descriptions of maritime services in the context of e-navigation. London: IMO. Retrieved February 20, 2026, from https://www.imo.org/ [in English]
15. International Maritime Organization. (2024). MSC.1/Circ.1610/Rev.1 – Descriptions of maritime services in the context of e-navigation. London: IMO. Retrieved February 20, 2026, from https://www.imo.org/ [in English]
16. International Hydrographic Organization. (n.d.). S-100 Universal Hydro-graphic Data Model. Monaco: IHO. Retrieved February 20, 2026, from https://iho.int/en/s-100-universal-hydrographic-data-model [in English]
17. Weintrit, A. (2013). Prioritized main potential solutions for the e-Navigation concept. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.07.01.03 [in English]
18. Pillich, B. (n.d.). Developing e-Navigation, the early stages. Retrieved January 18, 2026, from http://ushydro.thsoa.org/hy07/09_01.pdf [in English]
19. Ward, R., Alexander, L., Greenslade, B., & Pharaoh, A. (2008). IHO S-100: The new hydrographic geospatial standard for marine data and information. In Canadian Hydrographic Conference (Paper 425, pp. 1-12). [in English]
20. International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities. (n.d.). Official website. Retrieved January 19, 2026, from https://www.iala.int/ [in English]
21. EfficienSea2 Project. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2026, from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/636329 [in English]
22. Hojjati-Emami, K., Dhillon, B. S., & Jenab, K. (2012). The concept and methodology for developing effective human reliability databanks in road transportation. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 3(2), 45-58. [in English]
23. Baldauf, M., & Hong, S. B. (2016). Improving and assessing the impact of e-Navigation applications. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 4, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2016.06.001 [in English]
24. Rossomakha, O., Tomchakovskyi, H., Koliesnik, O., Safian, O., & Oberto Santana, L. (2025). Pidvodnyi LiDAR yak kliuchovyi komponent intehrovanykh system doslidzhennia okeanu [Underwater LiDAR as a key component of integrated ocean exploration systems]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho morskoho universytetu, 77, 140-164. https://doi.org/10.47049/2226-1893-2025-3-140-164 [in Ukrainian]
25. Norwegian Maritime Authority. (n.d.). Development of an e-Navigation Strategy Implementation Plan: Report of the Correspondence Group on e-navigation to NAV 59 submitted by Norway. [in English]
26. Jeppesen. (n.d.). e-NAV Concept and Test Beds. Retrieved January 21, 2026, from https://docs.iho.int/mtg_docs/rhc/NIOHC/NIOHC14/NIOHC14-12.4b-e-NAV-Concept-and-Test-Beds-JEPPESEN.pdf [in English]
27. Hahn, A. (2015). Simulation environment for risk assessment of e-Navigation systems. In Proceedings of the ASME 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2015) (Paper OMAE2015-41498). [in English]
28. Imset, M., & Øvergård, K.I. (2013). Shared mental models of challenging maritime situations: Comparisons of ship and shore personnel in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. TransNav, 7(3), Р. 393-398. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.07.03.08 [in English]
29. Ship Technology. (n.d.). New $2.15bn automated terminal opened in China’s Yangshan Port. Retrieved January 22, 2026, from https://www.ship-technology.com/news/new-2-15bn-automated-terminal-opened-chinas-yangshan-por [in English]
30. PSA International. (n.d.). World’s largest automated terminal begins trials. Retrieved January 23, 2026, from https://psabdp.com/news/world-s-largest-automated-terminal-begins-trials [in English]
31. World Economic Forum. (2023). The Digital Transformation of Yangshan Port. Retrieved January 24, 2026, from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Yangshan_Port_2023.pdf [in English]
32. International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities. (n.d.). MONALISA 2.0. Retrieved January 25, 2026, from https://www.iala.int/technical/planning-reporting-testbeds-maritime-domain/monalisa-2-0 [in English]
33. European Commission. (n.d.). Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T). Retrieved January 26, 2026, from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/trans-european-transport-network-ten-t_en [in English]
34. Sea Traffic Management. (n.d.). Retrieved January 27, 2026, from https://www.seatrafficmanagement.info/ [in English]
35. Maritime Connectivity Platform. (n.d.). Official website. Retrieved January 28, 2026, from https://maritimeconnectivity.net/ [in English]
36. International Hydrographic Organization. (n.d.). An overview of the Maritime Cloud – input to IMO e-nav CG. Retrieved January 29, 2026, from https://legacy.iho.int/mtg_docs/com_wg/SNPWG/SNPWG17/SNPWG17-9.3_An_overview_of_the_Maritime_Cloud.pdf [in English]
37. International Hydrographic Organization. (n.d.). S-100 standards in force. Retrieved January 30, 2026, from https://iho.int/en/s-100-standards-in-force-0 [in English]
38. Safety4Sea. (n.d.). IHO member states adopt first set of standards within the S-100 framework. Retrieved January 31, 2026, from https://safety4sea.com/iho-member-states-adopt-first-set-of-standards-within-the-s-100/ [in English]
39. STM Validation. (2020). Cost benefit analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2026, from https://stm-stmvalidation.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/uploads/20200225092918/STM_ID_5.3.6_STM-VALIDATION-COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS-1.pdf [in English]
40. International Hydrographic Organization. (n.d.). The digital twin of the navigable waters: Paving the way for e-navigation. Retrieved February 5, 2026, from https://iho.int/en/the-digital-twin-of-the-navigable-waters-paving-the-way-for-e-navigation [in English]
41. ScienceDirect. (2025). Article S235214652500047X. Retrieved February 10, 2026, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235214652500047X [in English]
42. Sensors (MDPI). (2025). Article 25(17):5508. Retrieved February 13, 2026, from https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/17/5508 [in English]